| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Ginger Barbarella
2033
   |
Posted - 2014.11.25 17:58:05 -
[1] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Fonac wrote:So is-boxer is banned?
edit: I Honestly dont care about is-boxer or what it can do, since i've never used it, or met anyone who uses it. But the OP is not very clear on it. isboxer isn't banned. Some of the things isboxer can do are banned.
Well that's clear as mud.
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
Ginger Barbarella
2035
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:16:06 -
[2] - Quote
Strata Maslav wrote:The SMUG in this thread is pretty sickening not very conducive for discussion. I play and love the same game you guys do and unfortunately I will be removing some of my monetary support from this game as a result of a decision that CCP has made out of the blue.
Um, wut? CCP has never approved opf or overtly allowed botting (ignoring the black-hat large alliance botting). All they've really done is further define what's what in terms of third-party tools and mechanisms used to control action in multiple clients. They still don't allow botting any more than they did a month ago. What's the problem?
There are other games that allow automated farming: go there. Those of us that respect the spirit of the game don't want you or your kind here.
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
Ginger Barbarella
2036
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:27:28 -
[3] - Quote
Zechariah Jericho wrote:Guys the toxic is getting high
Was in the middle of showing a friend this game, got to general discussion "what's that?" >>> 6 minutes later he decides he doesn't want to play because of our community and how badly we're reacting to the news that people cannot play the way they want to.
last words of the discussion were (and I quote) "Some sandbox, lets just go play LoL"
There's a reason I don't discuss cap warfare: I don't know d!ck about it. You and your friend clearly don't have a clue. Perhaps you should consider not discussing the concept of "sandbox" as it applies to this world.
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
Ginger Barbarella
2036
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:43:55 -
[4] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:
Keep in mind that I'm an embedded realtime operating system developer with decades of technical experience, and even I am unclear on what it meant.
I think that's the intent. By being carefully vague they are ensuring their own wiggle room and misinterpretation by their own personnel. Clearly defining exactly what is meant makes room for development of a new technique or software that expressly isn't covered by their own EULA/policies.
Personally i think they're misusing both "broadcasting" and "multicasting", but whatever. 
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
Ginger Barbarella
2036
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:45:51 -
[5] - Quote
FunGu Arsten wrote:a good thing i didn't reactivate those 40 extra accounts i have :D
i will miss isboxer, but CCP has spoken..
wts 100 chars as i dont need the acounts anymore :D (wrong thread .. brb )
Buh-bye.
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
Ginger Barbarella
2040
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:38:30 -
[6] - Quote
Mr Omniblivion wrote:This is ironic but the logical change next to be made is to nerf afk cloaking.
0/10
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
Ginger Barbarella
2040
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 00:03:26 -
[7] - Quote
Black Ambulance wrote:February at Evenews24
Devs allowing Isboxer back as there were no Christmas bonuses due to mass unsub
From my read the only mass anything here is the people in loud SUPPORT of this move. Let the botters leave to farm another game. I don't care in the slightest.
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
Ginger Barbarella
2041
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 00:49:26 -
[8] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:
So what happens when CCP's connections is being DDoSed or doing it's usual lag at random late hours and all my commands arrive at the server at the same time? From the server's perspective it'd look like I'm using a repeater but in reality all I did was alt tab through a bunch of windows quickly.
Blue sky must mean the planet is surrounded by water (according to your logic)...
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
Ginger Barbarella
2044
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 15:55:17 -
[9] - Quote
Dustpuppy wrote:[quote=Digger Nolm]Keep in mind that jan 1 2015 I will cancel 5 accounts as I will not be able to grind enough isk to run those accounts with the new ban on key broadcasting. That's atleast $100 US less you wont get from me. 
Something is wrong in your comment. If you do "grinding for isk" then you don't pay 100 USD/month, you play for free.
It is someone else who pays the 100 USD and this person is not connected to you. Without connection there is no link and no influence between your actions and his actions. /quote]
WTF is wrong with you?!?!?! Quit being logical! This is EveO! We can only have knee-jerk reactions here and pointless high-sec wardecs!!
Get with it, man... Like 4chan, we have standards to maintain here!!
[ / sarcasm ]
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
Ginger Barbarella
2044
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 16:10:38 -
[10] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Jean Luc Lemmont wrote:And yet, according to the CODE members that have posted in this thread, this change will have very little impact on their suicide ganking operations.
So either they are lying or you are wrong about this being a ganking nerf.
No, I get it. Like a page or two ago I looked into this some more, and realized that the actual impact will be marginal. However, the fact that CCP is doing this to target (and this is just my own hypothesis) suicide-ganking is troubling.
The only group being "targeted" is botters. This only changes ganking for those that can't or won't work with others or don't know how to do it right and have to resort to blob mentality for their lulz. Gankers that use botting software to do their deed are no better than losers who user roofies to drug women to get into their pants. Same kind of person, same mental issues.
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
|
| |
|